Week 29 · 13–19 July 2026 · 13. July 2026

A Concorde week. Just without the quiet cabin.

Week 5 of my public experiment

The calendar looked fairly harmless. One planned customer contact, a little room for my own topics. Then came Miro boards, Teledata trails, Misthos, Tanja, One Tax, book sources, Daily Notes and my body, which pulls the plug after two to three hours.

→ Jump to content

1 · What I expected

  • A calmer week with time for the vault, sources and the Existonomist site.
  • Bring the reconstructed weeks into linguistic order and connect Medium cleanly.
  • Stabilise open technical pipelines on the side.

2 · What really happened

  • The week flew like Concorde: barely boarded, already arrived. Processing had to come later.
  • Miro and OneDrive brought real workshop pearls to the surface: Teledata, Momentum, RiskMastery, Misthos and Tanja.
  • One Tax returned through current affairs, while body limits and the output trap put an edge on the productivity rush.

3 · What this week did to me

01

The calendar said: chill

On paper, this week was manageable. Exactly one of those weeks where you believe you can finally sort your own topics. Smooth and publish the website, research sources cleanly, maybe bring a little more overview into the vault. The calendar said: chill. Life had another script.

02

Then the thunderstorm arrived

Miro boards laid my existing ventures on the table. OneDrive pulled old and new venture trails behind them. Spontaneous conversations moved the partnerships with Tanja and Teledata into focus. Suddenly the question was no longer whether the site is online and works. It was whether it can carry real work: conversations, partners, business models, confidence, and for example the question of how people in adaptive accelerator companies can grow and earn more money without falling back into old career logic.

03

Visible, but not naked

That is the new publication standard. I want to tell my week: who I thought with, what happened, what about it is Existonomy. But not as a confessional. Customer names, health details, family, numbers and internal business logic stay at the door until I release them consciously. The economic questions still must not disappear. Otherwise The Existonomist shows the freshly wiped workbench and hides the workpiece. I want to show my way of living as an existonomist here. I want to nudge others to look in the same direction, and perhaps even walk that way. But I am not an exhibitionist. So the balance will matter: telling what is worth saying, without staring at my own navel.

04

When the body refuses

Beside the mental Concorde, my body sits in the control tower and cuts the power after two to three hours. If I want more, I pay with migraine or a whole day of rest. That sounds inconvenient. It is. But it is also existonomic: economy can no longer begin with an hourly proof of performance. The question I am asking instead is: what kind of existence can carry work without tying it to time?

05

Output trap and outcome risk

The extended-mind approach remains seductive. One more dashboard, one more pipeline, one better import. But is that only another rabbit hole for spending more time with myself? The question for me, The Existonomist, is therefore not: how much have I built? It is: which of it changes the way I contribute, and what I contribute?

4 · What I take from it

  1. These weeknotes need more than technical status alone. They need calendar context, content and reflection.
  2. Economic work may become visible in anonymised form: Misthos, One Tax, adaptive accelerator, ventures, partnership work.
  3. The body is not a productivity glitch. It is part of the existonomic situation.

Difference

Expected: a quiet week with room for my own topics. What emerged was a rollercoaster through customer topics, source work, productivity chase, tax return and the question of where output tips into outcome and where it merely serves itself.

Outlook

Next, The Existonomist gets a new source logic: calendar, conversations and contents provide the body of the week; reflection decides what may breathe in public.

Next hypothesis

The Existonomist becomes credible when real economic work becomes visible and it still remains clear what is private, protected or not yet mature.